May 18, 2016

Everything should be evidence-based - if only the evidence would make up its mind already

This question came up on an Evaluation mailing list and was forwarded to non other than Andrew Gelman, and for our purposes it can be boiled down to: what do we really know about financial motivation in organisations? Do we know enough to be able to say something like in this case use this reward system, it will bring you optimal results”?

Reading through the illustrious answers it seems clear that there are dozens of different theories and variations of theories, each with some research evidence, but nowhere anything like an evidence-backed consensus.

Policy, project and programme design, …. everything should be evidence-based - if only the evidence would make up its mind already.

Motivation and reward are comparatively easy to conceptualise and research. If we can’t get consensus here, how are we going to get consensus with hundreds of harder real-world problems like how much should cash programmes after a natural disaster target women? - single women? how much? family size? conditionality?”

How can we construct Theories of Change if there is such a lack of consensus about what leads to what?

twitter evaluation Theories of Change social research

Previous post
Using tags on to get a custom rss feed e.g. for contributing to r-bloggers. On my old blog, any posts tagged with appeared in special rss feed with the tag , which was picked up by r-bloggers. On this shiny new blog powered
Next post
Beaufort and Rubrics A quick post about the Beaufort scale for wind speed, see below, as paradigm of a rubric. Rubrics are really important in evaluation. The Beaufort

This blog by Steve Powell is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, syndicated on r-bloggers and powered by Blot.
Privacy Policy